The Influence of Innovative Leadership Ability, Managerial Ability, Work Behavior, and Work Commitment on Work Productivity at Elementary Schools in Lebak Regency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20251153Keywords:
Innovative leadership, managerial ability, work behavior, work commitment, work productivityAbstract
This study examines the influence of innovative leadership ability, managerial ability, work behavior, and work commitment on the work productivity of elementary school teachers in Lebak Regency. Using a quantitative approach and multiple linear regression analysis, this study finds that innovative leadership and work commitment have significant effects on teacher work productivity. The study also shows that these variables are correlated in creating a productive and innovative learning environment. This research provides practical insights for elementary school administrators in Lebak Regency regarding the importance of the principal's role in enhancing work productivity through innovative managerial approaches.
References
1. Culduz M. The impact of educational leadership in improving the learning experience. Promot Cris Manag Creat Probl Ski Educ Leadersh. 2024;(February):168–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-8332-9.ch008
2. Qutni D, Kristiawan M, Fitriani Y. Human Resource Management in Improving The Quality of Education. Edunesia J Ilm Pendidik. 2021;2(2):354–66. https://doi.org/10.51276/edu.v2i2.132
3. Nadeem M. Distributed leadership in educational contexts: A catalyst for school improvement. Soc Sci Humanit Open [Internet]. 2024;9(August 2023):100835. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100835
4. Ganon-Shilon S, Schechter C. School principals’ sense-making of their leadership role during reform implementation. Int J Leadersh Educ [Internet]. 2019;22(3):279–300. Available from: http://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2018.1450996
5. Day C, Gu Q, Sammons P. The Impact of Leadership on Student Outcomes: How Successful School Leaders Use Transformational and Instructional Strategies to Make a Difference. Educ Adm Q. 2016;52(2):221–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15616863
6. Maheshwari G, Kha KL. A bibliometric analysis of the influence of leadership styles on employees and organizations in the higher education sector from 2007 to 2022. Int J Leadersh Educ [Internet]. 2023;24(7):1–42. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2023.2236968
7. Siagian R, Artha B. The Influence of Teacher Quality, Teacher Characteristics, and Teaching Experience on School Quality that Impacts Student Performance in Bandung: Evidence from High School. J Pendidik West Sci. 2023;1(03):184–92. https://doi.org/10.58812/jpdws.v1i03.255
8. Kholis N, Rohma H, Maesaroh I. Work Stress, Work Environment, And Teacher Performance In Islamic High Schools. Int J Sci Res Manag. 2024;12(04):6012–123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v12i04.em06
9. Alkaf A, Yusliza MY, Saputra J, Muhammad Z, Bon AT. A review of work effectiveness and efficiency, service quality and organizational performance literature: A mini-review approach. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management. 2021. p. 5127–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.46254/AN11.20210873
10. Bortoluzzi B, Carey D, McArthur JJ, Menassa C. Measurements of workplace productivity in the office context: A systematic review and current industry insights. J Corp Real Estate. 2018;20(4):281–301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JCRE-10-2017-0033
11. Creagh S, Thompson G, Mockler N, Stacey M, Hogan A. Workload, work intensification and time poverty for teachers and school leaders: a systematic research synthesis. Educ Rev [Internet]. 2023;24(4):1–20. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2023.2196607
12. Pallewaththa P, Wijesiri B. Occupational health: the impact of occupational stressors on job productivity. Sri Lanka J Soc Sci. 2021;42(2):149–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.4038/sljss.v44i2.8229
13. Uka A, Prendi A. Motivation as an indicator of performance and productivity from the perspective of employees. Manag Mark. 2021;16(3):268–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2021-0016
14. Rachman A, Suriansyah A, Effendi R. The Influence of School Culture, Principal Instructional Leadership and Work Motivation on the Teacher Performance of Elementary School. Int J Soc Sci Hum Res. 2023;06(05):2820–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i5-39
15. Ulfathmi, Arafat Y, Setiawan AA. The Influence of Principal’s Leadership and Work Motivation on Teacher’s Performance. J Soc Work Sci Educ. 2022;2(2):258–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.52690/jswse.v2i2.238
16. Eliyana A, Ma'arif S, Muzakki. Job satisfaction and organizational commitment effect transformational leadership towards employee performance. Eur Res Manag Bus Econ [Internet]. 2019;25(3):144–50. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2019.05.001
17. Nahid S, Muzaffar N, Abbas M. Impact of Teachers’ Motivation on Students’ Performance. Glob Educ Stud Rev. 2023;VIII(II):444–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gesr.2023(VIII-II).40
18. Anisah, Gistituati N, Rusdinal. Analysis of Factors Affecting Teachers’ Productivity. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference Innovation in Education (ICoIE 2020). 2020. p. 395–9. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201209.256
19. Halimah H, Syafruddin S, Earlyanti NI. The Role of Innovative Leadership in Driving Educational Management Transformation. QALAMUNA J Pendidikan, Sos dan Agama. 2024;16(1):207–18. https://doi.org/10.37680/qalamuna.v16i1.4745
20. Hayak M, Avidov-Ungar O, Bitton I. Circles of Support for Teacher Leadership Implementing Innovations at School: Point of View of Teachers and School Principals. Leadersh Policy Sch [Internet]. 2024;00(00):1–16. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2024.2327574
21. Khusni W, Mahmudah FN. The Principal's Managerial Ability in Developing Effective Schools. Int J Educ Manag Innov. 2020;1(2):99. https://doi.org/10.12928/ijemi.v1i2.1611
22. Warman W, Ratnaningtyas EM. Principal Managerial Competencies: Implications for Vocational Secondary Education. Budapest Int Res … [Internet]. 2022;3853–64. Available from: https://www.bircu-journal.com/index.php/birci/article/view/4071
23. Kou L. School Leader Behavior and Teacher Work Task Motivation Towards a Proposed Motivational Training Program for Teachers. J Educ Educ Res. 2024;8(1):235–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.54097/52j2pq14
24. Turk EF, Korkmaz Ö. Teachers’ Levels of Dedication and Commitment to Their Professions and Attitudes to Their Professions. Particip Educ Res. 2022;9(5):1–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.17275/per.22.101.9.5
25. Leal J, Baniel M. Work commitment, motivation, and job satisfaction on the quality of life of teachers. Divers J. 2024;9(1_Special):344–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.48017/dj.v9iSpecial1.2941
26. Gonzáles Cardona JA, Naranjo Valencia J, Calderón Hernández G. Relationship between organizational culture and school performance. A study in elementary, middle, and high school institutions. Desarro Gerenc. 2023;15(2):1–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.17081/dege.15.2.6414
27. Gomathy DCK. Organizational Behaviour and its Effect on Corporate Effectiveness. International J Sci Res Eng Manag. 2023;07(08). http://dx.doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM21471
28. Bhaker SK, GJU H, Sharma T. Factors affecting commitment level of teachers: An empirical research. Recent Trends Decis Sci Their Implic Bus [Internet]. 2020;(February). Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Suresh-Kumar-Bhakar/publication/339528497_Factors_Affecting_Commitment_Level_of_Teachers_An_Empirical_Research/links/5e578f214585152ce8f29898/Factors-Affecting-Commitment-Level-of-Teachers-An-Empirical-Research.pdf
29. Quines LA, Albutra DA. The Mediating Effect of Normative Commitment on the Relationship Between Instructional Coaching Skills and Teamwork of Teachers. Eur J Educ Stud. 2023;10(3):143–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v10i3.4713
30. Noor S, Golzar J. Simple Random Sampling. Int J Educ Lang Stud. 2020;1(2):78–82. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijels.2022.162982
31. Roebianto A, Savitri SI, Aulia I, Suciyana A, Mubarokah L. Content Validity: Definition and Procedure of Content Validation in Psychological Research. TPM - Testing, Psychom Methodol Appl Psychol. 2023;30(1):5–18. https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM30.1.1
32. Neuenfeldt E, SULÍKOVÁ R. The Role of Leaders in Promoting Creativity in the Workplace : An Examination of Individual and Organizational Antecedents in Innovation Management. In: Conference of Faculty of Management, Bratislava, Slovakia. 2024. p. 0–8. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383497191_The_Role_of_Leaders_in_Promoting_Creativity_in_the_Workplace_An_Examination_of_Individual_and_Organizational_Antecedents_in_Innovation_Management
33. Nagy S, Pelser AM, Vaiman V. The improvement of Skills & Talents in the workplace [Internet]. Vol. 18, SA Journal of Human Resource Management. 2023. 1–10 p. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369661218_The_improvement_of_Skills_Talents_in_the_workplace
34. Khan MA, Ismail FB, Hussain A, Alghazali B. The Interplay of Leadership Styles, Innovative Work Behavior, Organizational Culture, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. SAGE Open. 2020;10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019898264
35. Limon İ. Relationship between Empowering Leadership and Teachers’ Job Performance: Organizational Commitment as Mediator. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim. 2022;15(1):16–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.945201
36. Day C, Sammons P, Gorgen K. Successful School Leadership. In: Education Development Trust Highbridge. 2020. p. 1–59. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED614324.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhamad Darif, Sudadio Sudadio, Yuyu Yuhana (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
