Creation and validation of the health-sick assessment format in the obstetric patient
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt2022172Keywords:
Obstetric Nursing, Health Risk Assessment, ValidationAbstract
Introduction: the obstetric patient is defined as a female patient who presents certain characteristics that occur due to alterations in maternal physiology and diseases developed during pregnancy, up to the delivery process.
Aim: to create and validate a health-nurse assessment form for obstetric patients during labor.
Method: a quantitative, cross-sectional and applied study was carried out with the participation of six experts in the health area; two obstetricians and four nursing graduates to validate the instrument, who gave their opinion on the wording and coherence of the items proposed. The pilot plan was carried out in 14 rotating nursing interns where the survey was applied and reliability was obtained with Cronbach's alpha. Once the validation and reliability were obtained, the instrument was presented to the study sample corresponding to 99 students of the fifth semester of the nursing career at the Technical University of Ambato.
Results: a Cronbach's alpha of 0,89 was observed, which is in a high reliability range; in addition, the format is valid, with an average acceptance rate of 1,00.
Conclusions: the application of the evaluation form to 5th semester nursing students determined that the instrument is appropriate (76,77 % TD), clear (60,61 % TD), appropriately timed (51,52 % TD), easy to apply (72,73 % TD), useful (75,76 % TD) and recommended for use (73,74 % TD).
References
1. NANDA. Diagnósticos enfermeros. Definiciones y clasificación 2018-2020: Elsevier; 2020.
2. Nava M, Urdaneta J, González M, Labarca L, Fernández M, Baabel N. Caracterización de la paciente obstétrica críticamente enferma, experiencia de la maternidad "Dr. Armando Castillo Plaza", Maracaibo, Venezuela: 2011 - 2014. Revista chilena de obstetricia y ginecología. 2016; 81(4): 288-296. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-75262016000400004.
3. Acho S, Pichilingue J, Díaz J, García M. Morbilidad materna extrema: admisiones gineco-obstétricas en las unidades de cuidados intensivos de un hospital general. Rev Per Ginecol Obstet. 2011;(57):87-92. https://doi.org/10.31403/rpgo.v57i190.
4. Jiménez W, González G, Velázquez E. Instrumento de autoevaluación de enfermería en la valoración de mujeres con preeclampsia en un hospital de segundo nivel. Rev Enferm Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2020; 28(2):102-110.
5. Acuña C. Valoración de Enfermería en Mujeres durante el Puerperio Inmediato, en el Hospital Gineco-Obstétrico de la ciudad de Guayaquil. Guayaquil: Universidad Católica de Santiago de Guayaquil; 2018. http://repositorio.ucsg.edu.ec/bitstream/3317/10091/1/T-UCSG-PRE-MED-ENF-425.pdf.
6. Rivera E, Galarza A, Valdiviezo M, Machado P, Betancourt C. Valoración de enfermería en gestantes con ruptura prematura de membranas. Revista Eugenio Espejo. 2020; 14(2):71-82. https://doi.org/10.37135/ee.04.09.09.
7. Cheza L. Evaluación de cuidados de enfermeira en pacientes con hemorragia en puerperio imediato. Universidad de Guayaquil; 2016. http://repositorio.ug.edu.ec/bitstream/redug/46677/1/CD%20207-%20CHEZA%20CASTRO%20LUCIA%20DEL%20CARMEN.pdf.
8. Mittelmark R. Evaluación de la paciente obstétrica. Manual MSD; 2021. https://www.msdmanuals.com/es-ec/professional/ginecolog%C3%ADa-y-obstetricia/abordaje-de-la-mujer-embarazada-y-atenci%C3%B3n-prenatal/evaluaci%C3%B3n-de-la-paciente-obst%C3%A9trica
9. Domínguez-Nariño CC, Camargo-Figuera FA, Flórez-García JP, et al. Validación de un formato para algunos diagnósticos de enfermería de interés en la familia. Rev Cuba Enf. 2012;28(4):455-464.
10. Sánchez Flores FA. Fundamentos Epistémicos de la Investigación Cualitativa y Cuantitativa: Consensos y Disensos. Docencia univ. 2019;13(1):101-22. https://doi.org/10.19083/ridu.2019.644.
11. Hernández R, Fernández Collado C, Baptista Lucio MdP. Metodologia de la investigacion. Sexta ed. Mc Graw Hill; 2014.
12. Cvetković Vega A, Maguiña JL, Soto A, Lama-Valdivia J, Correa López LE. Cross-sectional studies. Revista de la Facultad de Medicina Humana 2021;21(1):Article 22. https://doi.org/10.25176/RFMH.v21i1.3069.
13. World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 2013;310:2191-4. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053.
14. Mazzanti Di Ruggiero MD los Ángeles. Declaración de Helsinki, principios y valores bioéticos en juego en la investigación médica con seres humanos. Rev. Col. Bioet. 2015;6(1):125-4. https://doi.org/10.18270/rcb.v6i1.821.
15. Tobar RT, Sarmiento M del RP, Prieto BLA, Vélez SM, Torres AB. Análisis empírico del Coeficiente Alfa de Cronbach según opciones de respuesta, muestra y observaciones atípicas. Revista iberoamericana de diagnóstico y evaluación psicológica 2022;2:17-30. https://doi.org/10.21865/RIDEP63.2.02.
16. Cascaes da Silva F, Gonçalves E, Valdivia Arancibia BA, Bento GG, Silva Castro TL da, Soleman Hernandez SS, et al. Estimadores de consistencia interna en las investigaciones en salud: el uso del coeficiente alfa. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica 2015;32:129-38.
17. Borré Ortiz YM, Sánchez Padilla D, Márquez Caballero Y, Lobo Rojas L, Polo Granados M, Rodríguez Martínez V. Evaluación de la atención de enfermería por gestantes que asisten a un programa de control prenatal de Malambo-Atlántico (Colombia). Horizonte de Enfermería 2020;30(1):36-48. https://doi.org/10.7764/Horiz_Enferm.30.1.36-48.
18. Huda S, Cavey A, Izat A, Mattison P, Boggild M, Palace J. Nurse led telephone assessment of expanded disability status scale assessment in MS patients at high levels of disability. Journal of the Neurological Sciences 2016;362:66-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2016.01.011.
19. Costa IAP, Andrade ZB de, Souza M de L de, Costa IAP, Andrade ZB de, Souza M de L de. Validación de instrumento con indicadores para software de dimensionamiento del enfermero en la atención obstétrica hospitalaria. Index de Enfermería 2021;30:105-9.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Joselyn Ivette Freire Freire , Carmen Alicia Llerena Cruz (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
