Computerized anesthesia versus conventional anesthesia on self-perceived pain in children: systematic review and meta-Analysis

Authors

  • Héctor Fuentes-Barría Universidad Arturo Prat. Iquique, Chile Author https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0774-0848
  • María José Cañete Fuente-Alba Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Andres Bello. Concepción, Chile Author
  • Mirko Ramírez-Rivera Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Andres Bello. Concepción, Chile Author
  • Stephanie Rojas-Chavarría Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Andres Bello. Concepción, Chile Author
  • Raúl Aguilera-Eguía Departamento de Salud Pública, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción. Concepción, Chile Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4123-4255
  • Miguel Alarcón-Rivera Escuela de Ciencias del Deporte y Actividad Física, Facultad de Salud, Universidad Santo Tomás. Talca, Chile Author https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8341-5567
  • Olga Patricia López-Soto Facultad de Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Manizales, Colombia Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5045-820X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20251058

Keywords:

Anesthesia, Local, Drug Delivery Systems, Infiltration Anesthesia, Pain, Pediatrics

Abstract

Introduction: local anesthesia and computerized anesthesia via infiltrative technique have become a key component for painless dental treatments. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of computerized anesthesia compared to local anesthesia applied through the infiltrative method. Method: an electronic search for randomized clinical trials published between 2019 and 2024 was conducted in the Medline, Scopus, and Virtual Health Library databases. The search strategy used was 'Computerized anesthesia OR local anesthesia AND pain AND pediatrics.' A total of 170 articles were found, of which eight randomized clinical trials were analyzed in a qualitative synthesis, and six in a subsequent meta-analysis. Results: the results indicated that computerized anesthesia compared to local anesthesia is more effective in reducing self-perceived pain, presenting a large effect size (SMD: -1,05; 95% CI: -2,01 to -0,08). However, the few studies analyzed together with the high heterogeneity (Tau2= 1.38; Chi2= 120,76, df = 5, p < 0,001; I2 = 96 %) do not allow a complete affirmation of these findings despite that the literature has suggested better acceptance and reduction of fear of dental procedures associated with the use of syringes in the pediatric population. Conclusion: it is suggested that computerized anesthesia is more effective in reducing pain, although it is more expensive and requires more training to achieve an optimal, painless procedure that can reduce phobias associated with dental treatments.

References

Ashley P, Anand P, Andersson K. Best clinical practice guidance for conscious sedation of children undergoing dental treatment: an EAPD policy document. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2021;22(6):989-1002. doi:10.1007/s40368-021-00660-z

Bani-Hani T, Al-Fodeh R, Tabnjh A, Leith R. The Use of Local Anesthesia in Pediatric Dentistry: A Survey of Specialists' Current Practices in Children and Attitudes in Relation to Articaine. Int J Dent. 2024;2024:2468502. doi:10.1155/2024/2468502

Klingberg G, Ridell K, Brogårdh-Roth S, Vall M, Berlin H. Local analgesia in paediatric dentistry: a systematic review of techniques and pharmacologic agents. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2017;18(5):323-329. doi:10.1007/s40368-017-0302-z

Berrendero S, Hriptulova O, Salido MP, Martínez-Rus F, Pradíes G. "Comparative study of conventional anesthesia technique versus computerized system anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial". Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25(4):2307-2315. doi:10.1007/s00784-020-03553-5

Labanca M, Gianò M, Franco C, Rezzani R. Orofacial Pain and Dentistry Management: Guidelines for a More Comprehensive Evidence-Based Approach. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023;13(17):2854. doi:10.3390/diagnostics13172854

França AJB, Barbirato DDS, Vasconcellos RJH, Pellizzer EP, Moraes SLD, Vasconcelos BCDE. Do Computerized Delivery Systems Promote Less Pain and Anxiety Compared to Traditional Local Anesthesia in Dental Procedures? A Systematic Review of the Literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022;80(4):620-632. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2021.11.018

Clark TM, Yagiela JA. Advanced techniques and armamentarium for dental local anesthesia. Dent Clin North Am. 2010;54(4):757-768. doi:10.1016/j.cden.2010.06.017

Saoji H, Nainan MT, Nanjappa N, Khairnar MR, Hishikar M, Jadhav V. Assessment of computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system for pain control during restorative procedures: A randomized controlled trial. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2019;13(4):298-304. doi: 10.15171/joddd.2019.045.

Dempsy Chengappa MM, Prashanth AK. Evaluation of efficacy of computer-controlled local anaesthetic delivery system vs traditional injection system for minor pediatric surgical procedures in children. Med J Armed Forces India. 2022;78(Suppl 1):S89-S95. doi:10.1016/j.mjafi.2020.08.010

Riba-Roca A, Figueiredo R, Malamed SF, Arnabat-Dominguez J. A randomized split-mouth clinical trial comparing pain experienced during palatal injections with two different computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery systems. J Clin Exp Dent. 2020;12(12):e1139-e1144. doi:10.4317/jced.57506

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. doi:10.1136/bmj.n71

Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for 16 Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Disponible en: https://handbook-5-1.cochrane.org

Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557–60. 35. Sedgwick P. Meta-analyses: what is heterogeneity? BMJ. 2015;350:h1435.

Sedgwick P. Meta-analyses: what is heterogeneity? BMJ. 2015;350:h1435.

Barros T. P, Campolongo G, Sevilha F, Duarte D, Borelli Neto L, Alves N. Estudio Comparativo entre la Técnica de Anestesia Local Controlada por Computador y la Técnica de Anestesia Local Convencional. Int. J. Odontostomat. 2013: 7(2): 175-178. doi: 10.4067/S0718-381X2013000200002.

Abou Chedid JC, Salameh M, El Hindy C, Kaloustian MK, El Hachem C. Comparative study of two different computer-controlled local anesthesia injection systems in children: a randomized clinical trial. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2023;24(3):417-423. doi:10.1007/s40368-023-00793-3

Smaïl-Faugeron V, Muller-Bolla M, Sixou JL, Courson F. Evaluation of intraosseous computerized injection system (QuickSleeper™) vs conventional infiltration anaesthesia in paediatric oral health care: A multicentre, single-blind, combined split-mouth and parallel-arm randomized controlled trial. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2019;29(5):573-584. doi:10.1111/ipd.12494

Ludovichetti FS, Zuccon A, Zambon G, et al. Pain perception in paediatric patients: evaluation of computerised anaesthesia delivery system vs conventional infiltration anaesthesia in paediatric patients. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2022;23(2):153-156. doi:10.23804/ejpd.2022.23.02.06

Shetty S, Dalvi S, Katge F, Patil D, Chimata VK, Shetty A. Comparison of pain perception between computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery and the conventional syringe for inferior alveolar nerve block in children. Dent Med Probl. 2022;59(4):523-529. doi:10.17219/dmp/135897

Anil Ö, Keskin G. Comparison of computer controlled local anesthetic delivery and traditional injection regarding disruptive behaviour, pain, anxiety and biochemical parameters: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024;48(1):120-127. doi:10.22514/jocpd.2023.046

Vitale MC, Gallo S, Pascadopoli M, Alcozer R, Ciuffreda C, Scribante A. Local anesthesia with SleeperOne S4 computerized device vs traditional syringe and perceived pain in pediatric patients: a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023;47(1):82-90. doi:10.22514/jocpd.2023.002

Mittal M, Chopra R, Kumar A, Srivastava D. Comparison of Pain Perception Using Conventional Versus Computer-Controlled Intraligamentary Local Anesthetic Injection for Extraction of Primary Molars. Anesth Prog. 2019;66(2):69-76. doi:10.2344/anpr-66-01-09

Radwan MZ, Wassel MO, El Geleel OA, Elghazawy RK. Influence of computerized intraosseous anesthesia compared with traditional mandibular nerve block on children's behavior: A randomized clinical trial. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2024. doi:10.1111/ipd.13231

Monteiro J, Tanday A, Ashley PF, Parekh S, Alamri H. Interventions for increasing acceptance of local anaesthetic in children and adolescents having dental treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;2(2):CD011024. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD011024.pub2

Altuhafy M, Sodhi GS, Khan J. Efficacy of computer-controlled local anesthesia delivery system on pain in dental anesthesia: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2024;24(4):245-264. doi:10.17245/jdapm.2024.24.4.245

Santos EC, Huller D, Brigola S, Ferreira MD, Pochapski MT, Dos Santos FA. Pain management in periodontal therapy using local anesthetics and other drugs: an integrative review. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2023;23(5):245-256. doi:10.17245/jdapm.2023.23.5.245

Stern J, Pozun A. Pediatric Procedural Sedation. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls. 2023.

Carter JB, Mohammad AE. Building nonhospital-based platforms for ambulatory orthognathic surgery: facility, anesthesia, and price considerations. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67(10):2054-2063. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2009.03.036

Kwak EJ, Pang NS, Cho JH, Jung BY, Kim KD, Park W. Computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery for painless anesthesia: a literature review. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2016;16(2):81-88. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2016.16.2.81

Downloads

Published

2025-01-01

How to Cite

1.
Fuentes-Barría H, Cañete Fuente-Alba MJ, Ramirez-Rivera M, Rojas-Chavarria S, Aguilera-Eguía R, Alarcón-Rivera M, et al. Computerized anesthesia versus conventional anesthesia on self-perceived pain in children: systematic review and meta-Analysis. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología [Internet]. 2025 Jan. 1 [cited 2025 Jan. 20];5:1058. Available from: https://sct.ageditor.ar/index.php/sct/article/view/1058